Category: Story

  • Koen Geurts on strategic gaps, strong ecosystems and the role of patient capital in Europe

    Koen Geurts on strategic gaps, strong ecosystems and the role of patient capital in Europe

    “Our society cannot function without space technology”

    Koen Geurts on strategic gaps, strong ecosystems and the role of patient capital in Europe

    Hardly anything works today without space technology: navigation, logistics, telecommunications and climate monitoring all depend on satellites. We spoke with Dr. Koen Geurts, Senior Investment Manager at HTGF and a former space professional with 15 years of experience – including on the Rosetta comet landing in 2014 – about what this means for our society and Europe, and the role startups play in it. In this interview, Koen explains where Europe is strong, which gaps we need to close, and why patient capital is crucial for New Space startups to become true European champions.

    Koen Guerts, Senior Investment Manager at HTGF

    Space technology is increasingly understood as strategic infrastructure. What concrete role does it play today?

    Koen: Without space technology, our society as we know it cannot function. Navigation, logistics, telecommunications and large parts of our critical infrastructure are enabled by it. We can currently see this in Ukraine, where satellite-based internet determines the operational capability of troops, or in Iran, where we can often only track internal developments through satellite data, not subject to any borders. Satellite-based reconnaissance is also crucial for civilian crisis prevention and response, whether for wildfires, floods or monitoring illegal deforestation.

    Space technology is equally important in the civilian sector: weather forecasts, soil and vegetation analysis, as well as urban planning and infrastructure development depend directly on satellite data. The systematic collection of climate data – from ice masses to sea levels to greenhouse gas concentrations – would also be hardly possible without them. Europe is very well positioned here with the Copernicus program – the data is freely available in Europe and has enabled numerous new business models.

    In which areas is Europe a frontrunner in space technology, and where do you see gaps?

    Koen: In the Earth observation sector, Europe is clearly in the lead, both in infrastructure and in many applications. Copernicus is a reference program worldwide. Europe is also on par with the US in navigation thanks to Galileo, especially in value-added services enabled by Galileo and its security standards. We’re also seeing the first European New Space scale-ups becoming global leaders, such as Iceye from Finland. This is an absolute success story for Europe.

    At the same time, we have strategic gaps. In the LEO broadband sector – internet from space – there is currently no fully-fledged European alternative to existing systems. And we also lack our own capabilities in high-resolution optical reconnaissance with high repetition rates. If we’re serious about technological sovereignty, we need to invest smartly and precisely in exactly these areas.

    How is this reflected in the startup ecosystem?

    Koen: The momentum is impressive. Ten years ago, hardly anyone could have imagined that privately funded companies would develop complex space systems. Today, we’re seeing exactly that: Atmos is working on novel re-entry capsules, The Exploration Company on spacecraft capsules and rockets, LiveEO uses Earth observation data to identify risks along railway lines and power grids, for example. ISPTech is developing new propulsion technologies that are becoming even more relevant due to the changed security situation also in space. And Reflex Aerospace is building high-performance, configurable satellite platforms. Such teams would have been barely fundable in Europe just a few years ago. Today, there are founders who think big, and investors willing to take on this level of technology risk.

    SIGI satellite (Photo: Reflex Aerospace)

    Why do some companies develop faster than others?

    Koen: It depends heavily on where you sit in the value chain. Those who sell complete end-to-end services or systems to end customers can often more easily explain market size and business case – this helps with fundraising and winning large contracts. Teams at the component or subsystem level often develop crucial technologies but have more work convincing investors of market potential and tend to need longer to develop significant revenue. However, they are often very profitable.

    This is exactly where we need patient capital. Deep tech startups need time to build markets and gain trust. HTGF deliberately takes on early risks in such cases, and DTCF can support such companies in later scaling phases. That this pays off is demonstrated by examples like Dcubed, which today sells unique components globally and is internationally recognized.

    Large budgets are currently flowing into the space sector. What does this mean for startups?

    Koen: These budgets are enormously important, especially in security and defense-related areas. Of course, established companies play a central role in large infrastructure projects. At the same time, we should integrate startups and scale-ups much more consistently.

    On paper, this is often desired, but in practice, large tenders still too rarely go to young tech companies. Experience shows successful scale-ups may not deliver 100 percent of the requirements, but they fulfill 80 percent in 20 percent of the time or cost. We need this mindset in Europe if we’re serious about innovation.

    Looking ahead to the next few years: what is needed?

    Koen: We need three things: teams that think big technologically; investors who understand deep tech as a long-distance race; and public procurers who structurally integrate startups into large projects. It’s also important to think more in European categories rather than building separate champions in each country.

    If these come together, Europe can not only catch up in the space sector but take a leading role in many areas.

    Thank you for these fascinating insights, Koen.

  • “Incremental improvements are not enough” – Interview with Frank Desiere, CEO of CorTec

    “Incremental improvements are not enough” – Interview with Frank Desiere, CEO of CorTec

    “Incremental improvements are not enough” – Interview with Frank Desiere, CEO of CorTec

    With the second successful in-human implantation of a fully implantable brain-computer interface system, Freiburg-based medtech company CorTec is sending a strong signal for the next generation of stroke therapy.

    The technology addresses patients beyond the limits of traditional rehabilitation and opens up new functional potential. In this interview, CEO Frank Desiere talks about scaling, the role of long-term investors and mindset issues for medtech founders.

    Frank Desiere, CEO of CorTec (photo: CorTec)

    The second implantation of CorTec’s brain-computer interface is an important milestone. For which patients is the system suitable?

    Our system is intended for stroke patients who have not made any progress after years of intensive rehabilitation. Our device makes it possible to restart and accelerate therapy for these people, so to speak. The initial results are very promising.

    How can your technology change rehabilitation in the long term?

    Around 15 million people worldwide suffer a stroke every year. 80% of them suffer from paralysis, especially of the arms and hands, and 40% struggle with long-term limitations. That’s a real problem. Traditional neurorehabilitation helps for a certain period, but after six to twelve months, progress stagnates. This is exactly where we come in: our technology is designed for patients who no longer benefit from traditional therapy. We ensure that these people can regain their mobility and independence.

    The two implantations were carried out in collaboration with the University of Washington School of Medicine. How did international scientific expertise and research influence the further development of your technology?

    This is extremely important. We operate globally and collaborate with leading scientific partners in the USA, Europe and Japan. In addition to the University of Washington in Seattle, where we are advancing stroke treatment, we collaborate with the Mayo Clinic in the field of epilepsy, with Utrecht University for ALS patients and with the University of Freiburg in the field of depression. These networks accelerate innovation and ensure that we are always working at the cutting edge of research.

    How far along is development for the other indications?

    Stroke is our main indication and clear focus. In collaboration with the Mayo Clinic in the field of epilepsy, a very promising clinical trial involving 13 patients to date is already underway. This trial focuses on the early detection and prevention of epileptic seizures. Unlike with stroke patients, our device is used externally and is not implanted.

    HTGF is an early investor – since 2011. What role did this support play in the development of CorTec?

    Long-term investors such as HTGF are crucial for supporting and developing truly groundbreaking ideas. The investment managers at HTGF deserve great credit, because it takes a high level of expertise in various areas to recognise promising innovations. It also requires a clear vision and decision-making ability. Caroline Fichtner and Marco Winzer are to be congratulated for demonstrating this foresight. It is now becoming apparent that brain-computer interfaces are set to become a huge topic.

    Where do you see yourself in the international competition?

    We are not only on a par with our international competitors in the USA and China, but even ahead of them. Our unique selling point is that we can not only read the brain, but also write to it, i.e. send targeted signals to the brain. This opens up possibilities for neurological therapies of the future that others are not yet able to address.

    Can you already give us an idea of what the next steps will be – especially in the area of stroke treatment?

    We are now preparing the next round of financing. The next studies will be larger and more complex and will require more capital because of that. Europe is well positioned in the early stages, but when it comes to financing and conducting larger studies, we have a gap in the financing landscape. That is why we are also looking specifically at options in the United States and China to raise additional capital. Developing a medical technology product costs around €100 million, and we are in an area with many uncertainties.

    So far, we have been very capital-efficient as a company. We have also raised public funds and have come a long way with them. Many competitors have raised significantly more capital and are still nowhere near as far along as we are.

    What advice would you give to medtech founders?

    You have to think big and long-term: incremental improvements are not enough. It is important for founders to address issues that can make a real difference for patients. This creates a genuine medical and social impact and market potential that attracts investors.

    The right partners in academia are very important. You want to work with the best in the field to be at the forefront of implementing the latest ideas and findings.
    Partners from industry should ideally complement your own skills to really move forward in an innovation ecosystem.

    Finally, you need a team that is not only technically strong but also shares a common vision and drives an idea forward in an interdisciplinary manner.

    Thank you for the interview!

  • Rewiring Engineering: How Neural Concept Is Building the AI Intelligence Layer for Manufacturing 

    Rewiring Engineering: How Neural Concept Is Building the AI Intelligence Layer for Manufacturing 

    Rewiring Engineering: How Neural Concept Is Building the AI Intelligence Layer for Manufacturing 

    Neural Concept develops AI driven engineering software that enables industrial companies to design and optimise products faster. The Lausanne-based company, an HTGF portfolio company since its seed stage, recently closed a USD 100 million Series C round led by Growth Equity at Goldman Sachs Alternatives to accelerate the global expansion of its AI-native engineering platform. In our interview, founder and CEO Pierre Baqué shares how AI is redefining engineering and what it takes to build a global deep tech champion from Europe.

    Pierre Baqué, founder and CEO of Neural Concept (Photo: Neural Concept) 

    Pierre, when you meet someone who has never heard of Neural Concept, how do you explain what you do in a few sentences? 

    I usually start with the status quo in industry. Today, all advanced manufacturing companies rely on what I call the digital layerThese include simulation and 3D CAD tools that virtualize product development. Engineers design products, run simulations, analyse results and decide what to do next, all inside this virtual environment. 

    But even though everything is digital, it’s still humans driving most of the actions and decisions: drawing in 3D, launching simulations, interpreting results. 

    What we are building with Neural Concept is the intelligence layer on top of that digital layer. This layer drives the virtual environment and creates a new type of interface with these tools, one that is AI-augmented and AI-driven. It augments engineers, but ultimately it augments entire engineering organisations. 

    In short: we’re adding intelligence on top of the digital tools that already run modern product development. 

    AI and product development are evolving rapidly. Which developments are you watching most closely? And where do you see the biggest opportunities for Neural Concept? 

    I think all developments around AI agents for code and software development will have a tremendous impact on the software industry, and also on software for engineering, which is where we operate. 

    I believe everyone is still underestimating how big this impact will be. There has been some turbulence in the market recently, but this is really just the beginning. 

    What this means for our space is that many very large incumbents currently control the digital layer, the traditional CAD and simulation tools. With AI entering the equation, the cards will be reshuffled for the next generation of engineering software. 

    For new companies like ours, this is incredibly exciting. It’s a moment where you can rethink how value is created for customers and imagine entirely new ways of working. That’s a rare window of opportunity. 

    Can you share a concrete example that illustrates the impact Neural Concept has on day-to-day engineering work? 

    A good public example is our work with MAHLE, the German automotive supplier. They’ve been using our technology for some time now. 

    One result was achieving unprecedented product performance. For example, when designing blower fans used inside electric vehicles, they were able to significantly reduce noise levels, making them best-in-class in the market by a wide margin. This matters a lot, because in electric cars you can hear these components much more clearly than in combustion vehicles. A quieter fan directly improves perceived vehicle quality. 

    But beyond performance gains, the real shift is in the process itself. MAHLE is establishing a new development process around AI. They can now reduce development effort and respond much faster to specific requests from automotive OEMs. 

    So it’s not just about better products. It’s about faster iteration, more flexibility and a fundamentally different way of engineering. 

    You recently closed a USD 100 million Series C funding round led by Growth Equity at Goldman Sachs. What does this milestone mean for you and the company? 

    It’s a very exciting time, not only for us, but for technology in general. This round is really fuel for us to position Neural Concept as one of the companies that will redefine our market. More than an achievement, I see it as an opportunity to build something that will be remembered and that will shape how engineering is done in the future. And that’s the mindset we have going forward. 

    HTGF has supported Neural Concept from the seed stage as one of the first institutional investors, participating in every financing round. How would you describe our role on your journey? 

    HTGF has been an amazing and trusted partner for us. They’ve found the right balance between support and challenge, being there during more difficult times and sharing success with us as well. 

    What differentiates them for me is their breadth of exposure to the startup ecosystem. Through HTGF, and especially through Gregor, our investment manager, we have access to a very broad view of what’s happening across many companies and technologies. 

    As you grow, you often lose some visibility on early-stage developments and emerging startups. Having someone who sees the bigger picture and can act as a channel of information is extremely valuable. It helps us stay connected to what’s happening in the ecosystem. 

    Looking back on your own journey, from researcher to founder and scale-up CEO, what key lessons would you share with deep tech founders just starting out? 

    One important lesson is that at some point, you have to accept forgetting about the technology, at least for a while. 

    When you start as a deep tech founder, you naturally think about how to push your technology into the market. But eventually you need to flip that perspective. You have to look first at the market and ask: What does this market actually need? What problems do customers really have? 

    Only then should you think about how your technology can solve those needs. 

    This shift can be uncomfortable. In the beginning, your technology feels like your main asset. When you start focusing on the market instead, you might feel like you’re losing that asset. But in reality, your technology is still there. It just becomes a tool to solve real problems rather than the starting point. 

    Another lesson is commitment. Building a company is not something you can do at 90 percent. It really requires going all in, 100 percent. That level of focus and dedication is necessary. 

    And finally, you need to understand that business is business. Coming from research, you may initially see the world differently. But you have to learn how competition works, how companies operate and how markets function. That understanding is essential to building something that lasts. 

    How do you see the deep tech and VC landscape in Europe today compared to when you started? 

    It’s difficult for me to answer completely objectively because I’m no longer an early-stage founder myself. But from what I can see, there is definitely funding available in Europe. 

    You may not always see the very large, early-stage funding rounds that happen in the U.S., but if you build a strong company, show ambition and aim to win globally, you can find the capital you need in Europe. The ecosystem is there. 

    What’s also changing is the speed of development. With new AI tools and coding assistants, reaching a minimum viable product is becoming faster and easier. That’s great for founders, but it also means that other factors will become more important: distribution, network, product experience and execution. 

    Competition will likely increase, but so will the speed of innovation. For ambitious founders, that creates real opportunity. 

    Thank you, Pierre, for sharing these inspiring insights! 

  • 2026 Is Not a Hype Year – It’s a Reality Check for Startups

    2026 Is Not a Hype Year – It’s a Reality Check for Startups

    What will determine success or failure for startups in 2026? AI as a productivity lever, capital-disciplined growth, and technological resilience are moving to the forefront. We asked three HTGF partners which strategies matter now and what distinguishes the most successful founders.

    Their perspectives address key future questions: Dr. Tanja Emmerling, focusing on AI, organizational design, and scaling; Gregor Haidl, with a view on Industrial & Deep Tech; and Dr. Nik Raupp, with expertise in sustainability, resilience, and internationalization.

    Gregor Haidl:

    2026 will be defined by European technological sovereignty. After years of lagging behind, Europe is now investing heavily in its own solutions for space, AI & computing, energy, and defense. These are long-term developments that will shape not only the year ahead, but the entire decade.

    At the same time, we are seeing a renaissance of industrial tech. The enormous pressure to transform is pushing incremental innovation into the background; robotics and AI-driven research & development are becoming mandatory for manufacturing industries due to the shortage of skilled labor and compressed development cycles.

    The paradigm of “growth at all costs” is over.

    The era of undifferentiated funding waves is coming to an end; substance now clearly outweighs unconditional scaling.

    Dr. Tanja Emmerling:

    Artificial intelligence remains a central topic. But beyond the technological dimension, AI is fundamentally changing how companies are founded.
    Successful teams use AI-driven development and automation to validate business models in record time, build radically lean organizations from the outset, and reach early profitability with minimal burn rates.

    AI acts as a decisive lever to scale the company’s workforce efficiently, leverage the concentrated expertise and optimize the margin.

    Especially in the often critical early-stage phase, this technological leverage can become a decisive competitive advantage.

    Dr. Tanja Emmerling is a partner at HTGF. She has been a successful investment manager in the digital tech sector for over 10 years, has made profitable investments in 14 companies and has overseen around 30 investments as a project manager.In 2018, she set up the fund’s Berlin office on her own responsibility and has been managing the High-Tech Gründerfonds branch in Berlin ever since.

    Dr. Nik Raupp:

    Unfortunately, 2026 will likely be even more strongly shaped by ongoing geopolitical crises and disruptions. While long-term issues such as climate change may temporarily receive less attention, circular business models and the use of local waste streams are coming into focus as a major opportunity for the European economy.

    It is no longer sufficient to rely solely on competitive manufacturing costs. The local and European availability of raw materials must be taken into account.

    What is changing: we are moving away from the assumption that global supply chains will always function reliably.

    The focus is shifting toward technological resilience.

    What must founders pay close attention to in 2026?

    Dr. Tanja Emmerling:

    Successful founders in 2026 focus uncompromisingly on speed. Performance expectations are rising noticeably — not only in traditional KPIs, but above all in the pace of decision-making, product development, and market entry.
    Founders make decisions early, test quickly, and accept uncertainty where others are still seeking reassurance.

    Organization, product, and go-to-market are designed to maintain speed even as complexity increases.

    At the same time, they think globally and are not slowed down by political isolationist tendencies. Experienced VCs act as sparring partners for focus, timing, and scaling — helping turn speed into a sustainable competitive advantage.

    Gregor Haidl joined HTGF in 2017 and is responsible for investments in the industrial, climate and deep tech sectors. His focus is on complex B2B software and AI solutions for research and development, automation and energy. He co-founded the Munich HTGF office in 2023 and has been Head of HTGF Munich since 2025.

    Gregor Haidl:

    Especially for teams outside the major hype themes, one principle applies:

    Substance beats storytelling.

    Narratives matter, but they only hold if supported by robust KPIs and a clear path to commercialization. Investors today demand significantly higher commercial quality and operational performance.

    A successful pitch in 2026 requires a balance between bold vision, clear customer value, and measurable unit economics.

    Dr. Nik Raupp:

    The challenge of internationalization has not become easier in the current environment. German startups often focus on their home market for too long and later fail — frequently in the U.S. — due to the false assumption that everything works there the same way as at home. My advice:

    Internationalization should be strategically planned from the very beginning and prepared for over the long term.

    At the same time, it is essential to remain flexible enough to continuously adapt plans within a startup context.

    What do the most successful founders do differently?

    Dr. Nik Raupp:

    Successful founders have a finely tuned sense for flexibility without losing direction.

    They plan extremely capital-efficiently and with sufficient buffers for delays. While many established companies are currently retreating to their core businesses and scaling back external innovation projects with startups, top teams still manage to find new partners, inspire them around their vision, and reach key milestones despite overall uncertainty.

    Dr. Nik Raupp is responsible for expanding activities in the fields of chemistry and industrial biotechnology. His focus is on sustainable innovations, new materials and solutions for the circular economy. Before joining HTGF in 2021, he worked for BASF in Hong Kong, among others.

    Dr. Tanja Emmerling:

    The key is not to think about innovation in isolation. Successful teams actively integrate corporates into their innovation cycles — as customers, partners, or co-investors — and consciously bring them along at the required pace.

    They understand where existing industrial infrastructures can be leveraged and where they themselves must become the new driving force. At the same time, they recognize when it makes more sense to develop new models “on a greenfield,” to overtake established players. What matters is not an either-or decision, but the ability to master both: compatibility with existing systems and the courage to pursue radical new investments.

    Gregor Haidl:

    Very strong founders manage the balancing act between bold vision and operational reality. They don’t just sell a narrative — such as European competitiveness — but translate it into a concrete, measurable value proposition for the customer.

    They think radically from the market perspective, deliver continuous customer traction, and are highly adaptable.

    In short, they navigate challenging times by mastering both market positioning and financial performance with equal confidence.

  • HTGF 2025: Tailwind for Europe’s Wirtschaftswunder 2.0 – Romy Schnelle, Dr. Achim Plum and Sebastian Borek in conversation

    HTGF 2025: Tailwind for Europe’s Wirtschaftswunder 2.0 – Romy Schnelle, Dr. Achim Plum and Sebastian Borek in conversation

    HTGF 2025: Tailwind for Europes Wirtschaftswunder 2.0 – Romy Schnelle, Dr. Achim Plum and Sebastian Borek in conversation

    For HTGF, 2025 was a year that demanded many things at once: ensuring stability in the early-stage market, creating internal clarity and giving the starting signal for the next 20 years. In an environment of geopolitical tensions and subdued capital markets, we mobilised follow-up financing volumes in the billions and began to rethink HTGF, transforming it from a classic seed investor into a public-private VC platform that reliably supports founders across all growth phases with capital, networks and expertise.

    In our conversation, HTGF managing directors Romy Schnelle, Dr Achim Plum and Sebastian Borek look back on the lessons learned from 2025, talk about AI as a productivity lever, Europe’s opportunities in the global technology race, and why the next economic miracle 2.0 is not just a vision but can become reality through bold investment and consistent scaling.

    The HTGF management team: Sebastian Borek, Romy Schnelle, Dr. Achim Plum (from left – photos: Patrycia Lukas, HTGF, photomontage: HTGF)

    What were your HTGF highlights in 2025?

    Romy Schnelle: Despite a challenging market environment, we delivered strong results in new business. HTGF IV made 40 new investments in 2025 and we are fully on track with a total of around 110 investments in Fund IV. I am particularly proud of the substance of our portfolio. This is also reflected in twelve strong investments by our HTGF Opportunity Growth Fund, from Sdui as the digital backbone for schools to ADCs in cancer therapy, with Tubulis as the European benchmark in life sciences. It shows what we stand for, from AI to nuclear fusion, from robotics to space travel. These are key technologies that will make a difference tomorrow and contribute directly to the high-tech agenda.

    Achim Plum: New business was challenging, but our role was clear. To provide stability and enable financing, especially when markets are hesitant. I am particularly proud of the follow-up rounds in our portfolio, which are once again at record levels. We are currently talking about around 1.2 billion euros, almost 90 per cent of which is private capital. For me, this is more than just a number. It shows that we are mobilising private capital on a large scale and thus having a real impact on the ecosystem.

    Sebastian Borek: My personal highlight is our enormous potential. As a new member of the management team, I have witnessed first-hand the expertise and competence of HTGF and its team. With our high level of motivation and expertise, which is both broad and deep, we are very well equipped to meet future challenges. With the right attitude, we can do more than just talk about the next economic miracle — we can make it happen.

    2025 has not only moved the market, but also HTGF. What has been reorganised and further developed internally?

    Achim Plum: 2025 was a turning point for us. After 20 years, we have rethought HTGF. With the management team now complete, we have set out to actively shape the next 20 years. This spirit of optimism is palpable within the organisation. Our value proposition is being redefined, and that’s the right thing to do. We asked ourselves very consciously who we are and what we stand for. This has given rise to our strategic ambition. With new mandates, we are developing HTGF into a venture capital platform that brings together innovation from idea to scaling.

    Romy Schnelle: For us, transformation is not just a question of structures, but above all of culture and attitude. We have worked specifically to create clarity in communication, in decision-making processes and in the demands, we place on ourselves. Speed and reliability are not mutually exclusive. Especially in turbulent times, founders and our partners need both.

    Sebastian Borek: What particularly convinced me was the substance of the fund and its future viability. It’s about taking the business to the next level and constantly questioning ourselves. For me, this willingness not to rest on our laurels is one of the strongest signals from 2025.

    Geopolitical tensions and uncertain markets. What does this mean for start-ups, industry and investors?

    Sebastian Borek: We are experiencing the transition to a new industrial era. This creates uncertainty but also opens up enormous opportunities. For us as investors, this means identifying technologies early on that can not only improve existing processes but also transform entire industries. AI is a good example of this because it has an impact across industries. Finding and supporting these technologies at an early stage is part of our responsibility as HTGF.

    Achim Plum: Historically, both Germany and Europe have tended to seek social consensus before scaling up. In individual technological fields, such as genetic engineering, this has meant that opportunities have sometimes been missed. Today, however, innovation cycles are too fast for that. What is needed is innovation-friendly regulation and a pragmatic approach that exploits opportunities and manages risks instead of blocking progress out of caution. In times of geopolitical tension, technological and economic sovereignty is becoming increasingly important.

    Romy Schnelle: For companies, this means developing expertise and actively seeking partnership opportunities. Those who work with start-ups, research institutions and industry partners from the outset learn faster and can grow more robustly. Data expertise, AI integration and clear processes are key prerequisites for this.

    AI is developing rapidly. How do you view the opportunities and challenges?

    Sebastian Borek: AI is primarily a question of mindset. It is crucial that we seriously take advantage of its potential. Used correctly, AI can make our work more productive and efficient. Teams that use AI in analysis, product development or operational processes significantly shorten development times and can focus more on value creation. We have seen how a team used AI to produce a market analysis and presentation in one hour instead of two weeks. We must actively help shape AI. That’s clear.

    Achim Plum: AI addresses key challenges of our time, from demographic change and productivity to climate change. It acts as a catalyst that accelerates and scales existing approaches. Much of the progress made in the life sciences and medical technology would be inconceivable without AI. In this sense, AI is our superpower.

    Romy Schnelle: For founders, it is crucial to use AI responsibly from the outset. Data quality, transparency and clear ethical guidelines create trust. It is precisely this trust that is the prerequisite for sustainable scaling and thus a real competitive advantage.

    Achim Plum: We see great momentum in the life sciences, from synthetic biology to new forms of therapy. One example is Tubulis. Europe’s largest Series C life science round shows how smart approaches can significantly reduce the risk in drug development. There is also a lot happening in medical technology, for example in neural interfaces and smart prosthetics. AI is often the decisive lever that enables these developments.

    Romy Schnelle: Deep tech is experiencing a renaissance. Whether it’s fusion energy, quantum computing and infrastructure, or New Space, the potential for innovation is enormous. Often, it’s not so much the technology that fails, but rather critical financing and the courage to truly scale up. Smooth transitions from research to validation to industrial cooperation are particularly important. That’s exactly where we come in.

    Sebastian Borek: In the space tech sector, we are seeing companies that are not only developing products but can build entire industries. This is more than just a market. It is infrastructure for the future. With co-investments, partnerships and a clear platform approach, this can be scaled up across Europe.

    HTGF and DTCF are joining forces. What opportunities does this platform open up?

    Achim Plum: Our goal is to build an end-to-end venture capital platform that supports technologies from the idea to scaling. Through the close integration of HTGF and DTCF, we are creating a public-private structure that efficiently finances key technologies and gives them the opportunity to stay in Europe and grow here. The decisive factor is supercritical financing, i.e. capital that really supports growth. To achieve this, we rely on flexible models that also enable larger rounds and mobilise private capital.

    Sebastian Borek: The DTCF has quickly established itself in the market and demonstrated the importance of strong growth financing. Strong investments such as The Exploration Company or Cylib give companies in the early growth phase time and substance for development and scaling. At the same time, we see how well seed and growth perspectives work together in joint investments by HTGF and DTCF, for example in Proxima Fusion, node.energy or FMC. We are now systematically expanding this integration.

    Romy Schnelle: The integration of DTCF and its further development into a platform gives founders the necessary tailwind to build boldly and for the long term. Together with strong private partners, we are creating a financing architecture that supports companies from start-up to scaling, thus enabling new industrial substance in Europe.

    Finally, what does the start-up ecosystem need now to turn the tailwind of 2025 into a real economic miracle 2.0?

    Romy Schnelle: Above all, it needs consistent cooperation within the ecosystem. When research, start-ups and industry work more closely together, resilient bridges are created from the idea to scaling. This is exactly where new industrial substance grows.

    At the same time, we must ensure continuity in the early phase. Looking ahead, we are preparing the fifth generation of seed funds, which is set to seamlessly follow on from HTGF IV in mid-2027. To this end, we are starting to prepare the fundraising process in order to offer existing and new private fund investors from SMEs and corporations unprecedented access to the HTGF ecosystem and genuine value add.

    Sebastian Borek: We need optimism about the future and the courage to tackle things decisively and scale up. Capital, talent and technology are available. Now it is important for founders to create an environment that supports and reinforces this spirit.

    Achim Plum: Be bold. Think big. We need to mobilise private capital on a completely different scale and structure financing in such a way that growth becomes truly possible. Then the current tailwind can give rise to Wirtschaftswunder 2.0.

  • The biggest bottleneck in the AI stack and FMC’s solution – Interview with CEO Thomas Rückes

    The biggest bottleneck in the AI stack and FMC’s solution – Interview with CEO Thomas Rückes

    The biggest bottleneck in the AI stack and FMCs solution – Interview with CEO Thomas Rückes

    With a €100 million financing, FMC recently completed one of the largest investment rounds in the European semiconductor sector. The capital will be used to commercialise a novel memory chip technology that is expected to significantly reduce the energy consumption of AI data centres and set new standards for performance and efficiency. In this interview, CEO Thomas Rückes explains why memory has become the central bottleneck in the AI stack, how FMC is addressing this technologically, and what role Europe can play in the global competition for the next generation of AI infrastructure.

    Thomas Rückes, CEO of FMC

    Congratulations on the successful completion of the financing round! What does this financing mean for FMC and your growth strategy?

    With the fresh capital, we can consistently implement our product roadmap. We develop highly advanced computing systems – from our own chips to complete hardware and software solutions to integrated computing systems for AI data centres and edge applications.

    The recent financing not only enables us to bring these technologies to market, but also to build on them to establish revenue and corresponding P&L structures. This allows us to build targeted business units and thus drive FMC’s growth in a sustainable manner.

    Memory chips are considered the biggest bottleneck in the AI stack. Why are they so crucial for AI data centres – and how is FMC addressing this problem?

    In the hardware architecture of an AI data centre, processors such as GPUs and CPUs – from NVIDIA or Intel, for example – work closely with the memory. Within a server, these computing units are connected to DRAM via electrical connections. This memory is very fast, but volatile.

    Optical connections are then used to access NAND storage, some of which is also located in the cloud. This is significantly cheaper and non-volatile, but much slower. Every time data is moved between chips, compute, memory and storage, the available bandwidth decreases, latency increases and energy consumption rises. In data centres in particular, very large amounts of data are constantly being moved back and forth. This chip-to-chip communication is therefore one of the central bottlenecks for both the performance and energy efficiency of modern AI data centres.

    Your DRAM+ and 3D-CACHE+ technologies are designed to increase system efficiency by more than 100%. What makes your solution fundamentally different from established products?

    The key point is that we achieve the required computing power without having to constantly move data back and forth between different chips. The more information that remains in the same chip, the faster the overall system becomes and the lower the energy consumption. This is exactly where our technology comes in.

    With our chip, we make DRAM memory non-volatile. This results in significantly less data traffic between compute, memory and storage. Since our memory can also perform more functions directly in the chip, we massively reduce chip-to-chip communication. This leads to a significant increase in performance and efficiency in AI data centres.

    There is currently no such solution on the market in this form. Our approach is correspondingly disruptive, especially with regard to AI data centres, which are currently the most complex and powerful computer systems developed by humankind.

    Many existing approaches attempt to improve communication between chips or between memory and storage via photonics or optical interconnects. While this reduces bottlenecks, it does not solve the underlying problem. Our approach goes one step further: we address the root cause and can actually solve the problem.

    Europe has hardly any memory chip offerings of its own, while the market is dominated by the US, South Korea and Taiwan. How important is FMC for Europe’s technological sovereignty?

    The problem is even more complex. The headquarters of the major manufacturers are mainly located in the US, South Korea and Taiwan. Although production also takes place in other regions, such as Taiwan, Singapore, Japan and China, there is virtually no corresponding manufacturing capacity in Europe.

    FMC wants to play an important role here. We plan to launch our product on the market next year and then scale up in a targeted manner. Our clear focus is on AI data centres, and we are already in talks with European data centre operators and technology companies where we would like to introduce our storage solutions.

    Our technologies can make a relevant contribution to value creation in Europe. They enable the construction of AI data centres with world-leading energy efficiency, i.e. very high performance with significantly reduced energy consumption.

    What advantages does your Dresden location offer for your development?

    Dresden offers us a major strategic advantage, and we plan to further expand our activities here. The region has the most advanced semiconductor ecosystem in Germany and one of the leading ones in Europe. Large fabs such as GlobalFoundries and Infineon are located here. This is very valuable because it makes it easy to hold face-to-face discussions and pragmatically advance issues.

    Added to this is the high density of excellent research institutions, such as several Fraunhofer Institutes. With them, we can work on modular solutions in a very targeted manner. At the same time, the entire supplier ecosystem is in place: packaging companies, developers of sampling boards, software companies and many specialised smaller providers.

    This interplay between industry, research and specialised service providers makes the location particularly strong. In other parts of Germany, there are individual elements of this, but in our view, the complete package with this depth and density can only be found in Dresden.

    FMC was founded in 2016 and has developed into a leading player in less than ten years. What hurdles did you have to overcome on the way from research to global commercialisation – and which milestones were decisive?

    I myself was not involved yet when the company was founded, but joined FMC a few years ago with the clear mandate to transform the developed technology into marketable products and build FMC as a global semiconductor company. FMC was founded as a spin-off from the university and was strongly influenced by a research mentality in its early stages.

    We had to learn important lessons in the early projects. Just because a device works well technically, it does not mean that it will automatically result in an attractive product that customers are willing to pay for. On this basis, the technology development approaches were adapted and steered towards much clearer, market-relevant technology tracks.

    Such pivots are almost the norm for hard tech and emerging memory companies. The focused development of a technology into a new, clearly defined application takes time.

    Over the past two years, we have been able to develop specific products. However, this also requires significantly more capital. That is one of the main reasons for the large financing round that we have now completed. At the same time, we are building a team of highly experienced semiconductor experts and product professionals who are not only capable of developing these highly complex systems, but also of bringing them to market in a cost-effective manner. This is precisely where we are now taking the next decisive steps.

    What role did HTGF play as an early investor in your development?

    HTGF was the first institutional investor in FMC and played a key role, especially in the early stages of the company. Yann Fiebig closely supported the founding team as a member of the advisory board and, among other things, assisted with the structuring and negotiation of the IP agreement with the university: a crucial step for later scaling.

    In addition, HTGF contributed significantly to laying the foundation for further financing rounds. This led to contact with the lead investor of Series B at the HTGF Family Day, which marked an important milestone in our growth phase.

    HTGF has closely accompanied FMC from the early technological idea onwards, and with the current financing round, DTCF and other strong partners are now joining us to drive forward the next phase of our growth and global scaling.

    What’s next after the €100 million financing?

    The focus is now on product qualification and the cost-efficient commercialisation of our technologies. The goal is to achieve our margin and revenue targets and, building on that, to consistently scale the company. This will lay the foundation for establishing FMC as the world’s leading provider of memory solutions from Europe for the global market.

    What have you personally learned from this journey as a start-up CEO in a deep tech industry?

    This isn’t my first rodeo. I try to consistently apply the experience I have gained in the global semiconductor industry since 2001 to build FMC in the best possible way. I have learned my lessons and now it’s a matter of putting them into practice and building a really good company, and so far, this path is going according to plan.

    What advice would you give to other founders who want to start up in deep tech sectors?

    Deep tech is significantly more complex than many traditional software products, for example. Unfortunately, it is very easy to invest a lot of capital and end up with limited results because you are navigating a technological maze where you have to think many steps ahead.

    The development of deep tech and semiconductor products in particular is extremely capital-intensive and requires close cooperation between many internal and external partners. Building such a product is about as complex as developing a new car. It requires a clear plan, strong structures and professional project management. Structures that are more commonly found in larger companies. At the same time, you have to establish these processes in a start-up without losing the necessary flexibility and speed.

    My advice to founders is therefore: work with maximum commitment, but surround yourself early on with the right experts who really understand the industry and learn from them. It is crucial not only to work on problems, but to work on the right problems and with the right timing.

    Thank you very much, Thomas, for your time and insights!

  • “Creating a new option for hard-to-treat cancers”– Interview with Dominik Schumacher, CEO and co-founder of Tubulis

    “Creating a new option for hard-to-treat cancers”
    – Interview with Dominik Schumacher, CEO and co-founder of Tubulis

    Tubulis recently achieved two significant milestones: closing its Series C financing and releasing the first clinical data for its novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) against ovarian cancer. In this interview, CEO and co-founder Dominik Schumacher discusses how the company is working to overcome the limitations of current ADC approaches, why strategic partnerships matter, and Tubulis’ vision for the future of cancer treatment.

    Dominik Schumacher, CEO and Co-Founder of Tubulis (Photo: Tubulis)

    Congratulations on the Series C financing! What was the key to success in this process, and how do you plan to use the new funds?

    The strong preclinical data and initial positive clinical results have certainly formed a solid foundation that validates our differentiated ADC approach and underscores its broad potential in various cancer settings.

    With the financing, we will accelerate the further clinical development of our lead candidate TUB-040 and continue to expand our additional proprietary pipeline programs. In addition to TUB-040, this includes our second clinical candidate, TUB-030, and several preclinical programs. We will also continue to drive innovation in all areas of ADC development based on our proprietary platform technologies. Our primary objective is to integrate ADCs into novel therapeutic applications and make them a standard-of-care treatment in oncology, including early lines of treatment.

    The financing was just one important milestone in October: Tubulis also published initial clinical data showing promising efficacy and good tolerability in patients with ovarian cancer. What do these results mean for you and the team—and how do you assess this success?

    The data validate our approach and are the first clinical evidence that our novel technology can overcome current toxicity-related limitations for ADCs. In particular, the broad therapeutic window and well-tolerated safety profile should give physicians a level of flexibility in long-term treatment that currently does not exist. Overall, these initial results show that we are on the right path toward potentially offering patients living with this difficult-to-treat cancer a new treatment option.

    Can you explain in a few sentences what makes your technology special—and why it could make a real difference for patients?

    Our proprietary Tubutecan technology combines our unique P5 conjugation system with a very potent cytotoxic agent (called exatecan). This enables us to develop stable, highly targeted ADCs that are optimized for delivering the chemotherapy agent exatecan to cancer cells while minimizing off-target systemic toxicity. The resulting ADC candidates are designed to overcome the major limitations of earlier-generation ADCs, such as off-target systemic toxicity or a narrow therapeutic window. In addition, our unique chemistry enables us to generate novel antibody-drug combinations, potentially unlocking new therapeutic opportunities.

    How did you manage to convince investors in the current difficult market environment—and what role does an early-stage investor such as HTGF play in this?

    Early-stage investors are very important, and thankfully Germany has a strong ecosystem, particularly for young spin-out companies taking their first steps. We also began engaging with (potential) investors early and made sure we were visible in the field. Our strong data certainly also helped build confidence with investors. It is also important to consider your strategic positioning from the beginning and to develop a clearly differentiated business plan.

    ADC therapies are a rapidly growing field. How important are collaborations with other companies or research partners for your success?

    We believe that synergies can help bring innovative ideas to patients faster. That’s why, in addition to our proprietary pipeline, we also pursue partnered programs, for example with Gilead and BMS, one of which is also already in clinical development. We will therefore continue to evaluate opportunities for additional strategic partnerships to maximize the scope and impact of our technology platforms.

    You founded Tubulis from academic research and built it into a clinical company. How do you manage to motivate your team on this challenging journey and live a shared vision?

    A great team is essential for success. Every day, I am thrilled to work with such a dedicated, excellent, and strong group of people. We are very proud of our outstanding employees, without whom we would not have been able to get this far. We are united by our shared goal of creating real benefit for patients with our differentiated ADC approaches. This is a major driving force for all of us. The fact that our initial clinical results show that we are on the right track certainly gives us extra motivation for the next steps.

    What skills do you need as a scientist to become a successful entrepreneur—and what have you personally learned on this journey?

    Perseverance and, above all, the ability not to be discouraged by failures, but rather see them as an opportunity to learn from your mistakes and do better next time. You should always question yourself and be willing to change your ways and to delegate responsibilities. In the end, you have to grow and adapt just as quickly as the company evolves. It’s also important to start thinking about long-term strategies and overarching goals from the very beginning.

    What conditions in this country have helped you—and where do you see room for improvement for young biotech companies?

    Early-stage support during the spin-off phase is particularly good in Germany. Institutions such as UnternehmerTUM and awards such as the m4-Award and the Leibniz-Gründungspreis have been a great support for us during the founding days. Early-stage funds such as HTGF were also essential for our development, especially in the first few years. However, we still see a certain funding gap in Germany before companies reach their first major validation milestones. I also believe that encouraging entrepreneurial thinking at early stages, whether at university or even during grade school, would be a good thing.

    Looking five years into the future, where do you see Tubulis – and what would you like to see achieved by then?

    Our goals are, on one hand, to successfully complete the two Phase 1/2 studies with our lead candidates, TUB-030 and TUB-040, with solid clinical evidence of efficacy. On the other hand, we want to expand our pipeline by advancing our additional ADC programs into the clinical phase. Furthermore, we want to strengthen our global presence and operational flexibility by continuing to expand our corporate infrastructure, including our newly established subsidiaries in the US (Cambridge, Massachusetts) and Switzerland (Lausanne). Overall, we want to fully establish ourselves as a global innovation leader in the field of ADC therapies. To this end, we will continue to expand our portfolio of proprietary target structures, payloads, and conjugation technologies. Our long-term goal is clear: we want to provide cancer patients with new treatment options that offer a true clinical benefit.

    Thank you for your time and insights!

  • Networking over a meal: VC Lunches organized by the HTGF Investment Team 

    Networking over a meal: VC Lunches organized by the HTGF Investment Team 

    Networking over a meal: VC Lunches organized by the HTGF Investment Team 

    What began in Hamburg in 2021 is now an established fixture in the German venture capital ecosystem: VC Lunches. The idea was simple: bring together investors from VCs, CVCs, family offices, and active business angels in a relaxed atmosphere—without an agenda. Pure networking, but with a clear goal: exchange beyond the major hubs of Berlin and Munich. Topics range from deal flow and investment trends to private matters. 

    Johannes Dierkes, Senior Investment Manager at HTGF

    The first VC Lunch took place on July 9, 2021, at Café Paris near Hamburg City Hall – under Covid-19 restrictions and with just 14 participants. The initiator and organizer in Hamburg is Johannes Weber, now a principal at HTGF. Today, around 35 investors meet regularly in Hamburg, supported by partners such as DTCP and T. Capital. 

    The following year, Maurice Kügler and Johannes Dierkes launched the format in the Rhineland as a self-funded event in a Cologne brewery. Now held every three months, VC Lunch Cologne has become THE established industry gathering for investors in the Rhineland and, with up to 100 participants regularly attending, the largest of the VC Lunches organized by the HTGF Investment Team. Thanks to sponsors such as Gateway Uni Cologne and KölnBusiness, it was possible to create a relaxed atmosphere for informal exchanges in a larger space with bar tables instead of restaurants. 

    Münster and central Germany also have their own editions. In Münster, Christian Arndt and Ann-Christin Kortenbrede (Gründerfonds Ruhr, formerly eCapital) have been organizing lunches with around 20 guests since 2023. Martin Möllmann of the Berlin team has been bringing together investors from central Germany since 2023, so far in Leipzig, Erfurt, and Halle—permanent partners are Spinlab, Occident, and SI Ventures, and depending on the location, local partners such as bm-t or Investforum Halle are also involved. “With our VC Lunch in central Germany, we bring together the growing scene in Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia and create an active exchange between the various investors,” says Martin. “It’s simply a great platform for the participants.” 

    The VC Lunches are more than just lunch. They are a platform for deal flow. They strengthen regional ecosystems and create connections that would not otherwise arise. What began as a small group in Hamburg is now a growing community in several regions – and proof that networking is not only alive and well in the big hubs. On LinkedIn, participants are always full of praise for the events, which have developed into a permanent platform for exchange. 

    Interested in joining us next time? Contact Johannes Weber, Maurice Kügler, Johannes Dierkes, Christian Arndt, or Martin Möllmann on LinkedIn to secure an invitation. 

  • Interview with Sebastian Borek

    Interview with Sebastian Borek

    Interview with Sebastian Borek: Entrepreneurial Spirit, AI and a Vision for Europe 

    Since mid-October, Sebastian Borek has joined the HTGF management team as Managing Director, responsible for the Digital Tech division. Together with Romy Schnelle and Achim Plum, he forms the fund’s new leadership trio. In our interview, Sebastian shares what drives his passion for strengthening Germany’s future competitiveness, reflects on HTGF’s role in shaping the VC landscape and innovation ecosystem, and discusses how AI is enabling new business models and transforming the venture world. 

    Sebastian, you joined the HTGF management team on October 13 – even though you weren’t actively looking for a new role. What made you want to come on board? 

    Sebastian: I’ve always been fascinated by discovering emerging technologies early on and staying right at the forefront of innovation. The world is evolving at a tremendous pace, and I love being part of that change. At the same time, I’m driven by a bigger mission: strengthening the future competitiveness of Germany and Europe in close collaboration with industry and policymakers. HTGF is perfectly positioned for this. Thanks to our public-private setup, we have the resources and expertise to be broadly-positioned. Our team has close links with the research community and is well-connected across Europe, where innovative technologies are emerging. We’re able not only to identify future technologies but also to turn them into real-world applications and create meaningful value. We can serve as a think tank for industry, SMEs and our whole economy. 

    Together with Romy Schnelle and Achim Plum, you form HTGF’s new leadership trio. What makes this constellation special for you? 

    Sebastian: The team dynamic was one of the key factors for me. I met Romy and Achim early in the process and immediately felt that it was a great fit. We complement each other perfectly – different backgrounds and experiences, but a shared understanding and a really strong rapport. Each of us is responsible for one of three areas, each with its own ecosystem. Dividing this expertise while aligning around a holistic strategy at the management level makes complete sense to me. We think collectively and act in line with market dynamics across our investment areas.

    Sebastian Borek, Managing Director at HTGF (Photo: Patrycia Lukas)

    How has your experience with HTGF been so far? 

    Sebastian: On a personal level, my experience with HTGF has been really positive: a dedicated team with great commitment, a strong sense of responsibility, and an impressive range of expertise. HTGF is a large and complex organization, and I’ve been pleasantly surprised by how much depth there already is and how well everything is structured. 

    Right now, I’m having a lot of conversations and often there’s barely enough time. It’s the informal moments, like chats in the coffee kitchen or over lunch, that give me a really good feeling. I’m also looking forward to getting to know our Berlin and Munich offices even better soon. Overall, my impression so far has been very positive. 

    You’ve built companies and created ecosystems yourself – from Founders Foundation to Hinterland. How are you bringing this entrepreneurial mindset into HTGF? 

    Sebastian: Over the past few years, I’ve learned a lot about what it takes to build companies and create ecosystems. I want to bring those experiences into HTGF – wherever they can add value. At the same time, there are already many strengths here that I want to build on. My goal is to achieve the best of both worlds

    From my time with Hinterland, I know how to build bridges – between SMEs and industry, between founders, investors, and policymakers. We already have those capabilities at HTGF; now it’s about sharpening our focus and using them even more strategically. 

    But before applying any external concepts, I want to really understand HTGF. What hidden potential lies within the organization? How can we unlock it together? This is the perfect moment to redefine that – and that’s exactly what I’m working on right now. 

    How do you see HTGF’s role in the VC market and for the wider economy? 

    Sebastian: Twenty years ago, HTGF was one of the driving forces behind Germany’s VC scene. We helped shape the early stage of the ecosystem and fulfilled that mission very successfully. Today, it’s about being a role model again. Our public–private structure gives us the opportunity to take new paths – and that’s exactly our mandate. We need to identify where markets don’t function efficiently and where new, relevant needs arise that other VCs aren’t addressing. That’s where we can make a real impact. 

    The economy is undergoing a profound transformation. Artificial intelligence is changing far more than just processes – it’s having major societal implications. So we have to ask ourselves: how do we position ourselves for the future, and where do we want to set our priorities? 
    It’s an exciting phase: setting new impulses for the next 20 years, building ecosystems, bringing talented people into entrepreneurship, connecting startups with industry, and strengthening innovation. Our current mission still applies – but it needs to be rethought and applied in a way that fits today’s markets. 

    That’s exactly what we’re tackling as part of our strategic process: developing clear investment hypotheses that address not only current but also future market needs. 

    We’re more than 100 people with diverse skills and perspectives. We’re using that diversity to shape a strong strategy. My goal is clear: we must be pioneers – and we can be. 

    What role does HTGF’s close connection to industry partners and SMEs play? 

    Sebastian: Our close ties to industry and the Mittelstand are one of our greatest competitive advantages. We give startups access to established companies while helping industry players recognize and leverage innovation at an early stage. Industry is looking for solutions, while startups bring agility and the courage to test new business models. We bridge that gap — acting almost like an extended R&D arm for the economy. 
    AI is growing at an incredible pace and challenges both founders and VCs. The key question is: Which technology should I bet on? Markets are changing fast, so products, business models and we as investors today need to be far more adaptable and agile. 

    This is a huge challenge, especially for industrial and family-owned companies. They carry responsibility for their regions and employees and are under significant pressure. That’s where we can help: we’re the partner that identifies the right investments and turns innovation into a competitive advantage. Our role is to build bridges between startups and industry — and with AI and ongoing transformation, that bridge is becoming even more important. 

    You’ll be leading the Digital Tech investment division. Which developments will shape the coming years, and how are you preparing for them? 

    Sebastian: AI will transform an entire spectrum of business models in the years ahead. We have to look very closely: who will be disrupted by AI, and who can use it to accelerate growth? The challenge is that we often think linearly, while technological progress is exponential. Especially in the digital tech space, everything moves even faster. That’s what excites me, but it also carries risks. We need to understand where the real substance lies: proprietary data, clear applications, and genuine unfair advantages. 

    That’s why I’m a big believer in hypothesis-driven investing. We develop guiding theses about which technologies will prevail and what impact they’ll have on different industries, and we continuously validate those hypotheses. It’s the only way to invest intelligently. 

    At the same time, it takes a deep understanding of both technology and markets. Today, investors need to be able to engage with founders as equals on a content level. Only then can you earn your place on the right cap tables. 

    You recently said that Germany needs to send a clear signal that it attracts founders. What could that signal look like in practice? 

    Sebastian: That question has been on my mind for more than ten years. Right now, the U.S. is the strongest magnet for founders, with larger funding rounds, greater risk appetite, and an ecosystem that thinks big. We can’t copy that culture one-to-one, but we can play to our own strengths. 

    Germany and Europe need a clear vision for the future, a narrative that shows: this is where the jobs and technologies of tomorrow are being created. Instead of just saying we’ve fallen behind, we need to define and occupy new fields like quantum computing, fusion technology or humanoid robotics. 

    That’s not wishful thinking; it’s a strategic necessity. We need to develop hypotheses about where we want to be global leaders in ten years and build the capabilities to get there. HTGF can play a key role here, not only for Germany, but for Europe as a whole. We have the opportunity to connect ecosystems and translate research into real-world applications. 

    From Lisbon to Bonn – what would you say Germany could learn from Portugal’s startup scene? 

    Sebastian: In Lisbon, the European spirit is much more alive. The ecosystem is international, and Portugal has deliberately positioned itself as a startup hub. That attracts talent and investment and shows what can happen when politics and key players share a clear vision. Attract, don’t chase – that’s the mindset. You need to develop a clear sense of what you want to be and then work towards it with consistency. 

    That’s the kind of mindset I want to bring to HTGF as well. We need strong networks, international connectivity, and a narrative that fits our strengths. Europe has enormous potential — we just have to actively unlock it. 

    And finally: when you look back in three years, what do you want to be measured by? 

    Sebastian: Most importantly, I want everyone at HTGF to genuinely enjoy coming to work, not just because of our culture or the great offices, but because they know that what we do truly matters. We’re shaping future viability. 

    If we can create that sense of purpose not only within HTGF but across our entire ecosystem, I’ll be happy. I want to spark a sense of optimism for the future — a feeling that things are moving, that it’s worth the effort. If not us, who? If not now, when? 

  • Interview with Julian Wiedenhaus on Plancraft Series B 

    Interview with Julian Wiedenhaus on Plancraft Series B 

    “Complex work becomes a simple voice command” – Interview with Julian Wiedenhaus on Plancraft Series B 

    Amidst a shortage of skilled workers in the construction industry and increasing demands due to climate targets, plancraft is focusing on digital solutions that make craft businesses more efficient and rethink processes. We spoke with Julian Wiedenhaus, CEO of plancraft, about AI in the skilled trades, European expansion, and scaling after the €38 million Series B. 

    Julian Wiedenhaus, co-founder of plancraft. An app/software and AI agent for craftsmen. Photographed in the plancraft offices in Hamburg, Germany. ( Photo: Maria Feck)

    TL;DR: Plancraft after Series B – The 5 most important insights 

    • Expansion into 5 countries (NL, IT, ES, PL, DE) with dedicated teams. 
    • The Netherlands is the most experimental – tradespeople across Europe have the same pain points: too much paperwork, lack of overview. However, the mentality regarding innovation and its adaptation varies.  
    • Culture needs active leadership – leading by example, fixed rituals, and constant investments (events, workations) allow #stoked #together #humble to scale as a culture. 
    • Digital foremen coordinate the business – AI co-workers will take over quote, invoices, telephony, time recording, and construction site documentation for ~20,000 craft businesses in the future, saving up to 8h weekly. 
    • Vision 2028: European standard – Plancraft as the backbone for construction and crafts, digital foremen on every construction site, measurable climate impact through efficiency gains with AI, and greater adaptation of technology through generational change 

    Congratulations on your Series B! What specific milestones has Plancraft already achieved before and after the €38 million Series B? 

    Thank you! Looking back, there were three clear successes: the biggest milestone was that we exceeded 20,000 customers, for whom we create freedom every day in the skilled trades. In addition, we scaled plancraft dramatically and allowed it to mature, so another important milestone for us was reached when our organization was complete. We filled all positions in our management team – including the VP layer – and built a strong go-to-market team with four heads of sales, marketing, customer success and revenue operations. This was crucial in transforming Plancraft from a fast-growing startup into a scalable company. 

    At the same time, we started our European expansion: we now have our own employees in the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, and Poland. This has laid the foundation for establishing our trades software as a truly European platform for the construction and trades industry. 

    You focus strongly on AI. Which application will be the first to really help tradespeople in their everyday work? 

    For trades businesses, every minute spent in the office means lost value creation. Our greatest leverage therefore lies in the digital foreman—an intelligent co-worker who takes over office work, thinks, and learns along the way. Just as we have two core user groups—back office and construction site—the tangible benefits also vary: 

    In the back office, the digital foreman takes care of routine tasks such as quotes, invoices, telephony, documentation, and digital time recording. It thinks along with you, automatically structures projects, and thus saves many hours of administrative work. 

    For construction site users, the digital foreman should literally be on call in their pocket: craftsmen can use voice commands to generate reports on their working day or call up information from their projects – for example: “What material is specified in the service specifications for the vapor barrier on the roof?” 

    This turns complex office work into a simple voice command – and that’s a real relief in everyday life. What’s particularly exciting is that in the skilled trades, the best specialists are often also managing directors or master craftsmen who already have too much responsibility. By reducing their overhead hours, we free up valuable time for the construction site, the team, and customers. 

    So, you are now active in countries such as the Netherlands, Italy, and Austria. How do craft businesses in Europe differ in their attitudes toward digitalization and AI? 

    Yes, especially in terms of openness to new technologies. We see the greatest willingness to experiment in the Netherlands, where things are quickly tried out and scaled up if they work. In Germany, the demand for accuracy and data quality is higher, which often makes implementation more thorough, but also somewhat slower. 

    Despite these differences, the same applies everywhere: everyone realizes that they need digital solutions. The problems are very similar—too much time spent in the office, complex planning and organization of teams and construction sites, and a lack of overview in everyday life. And everyone wants the same thing: simple, easy-to-learn craftsman software that really reduces the workload. 

    When you talk directly to tradespeople on the construction site, what specific insights do you gain? 

    Above all, how different the challenges really are – depending on the trade, size of the business, or technical openness. I listen carefully to where time is still being lost, despite digital support. These conversations are invaluable to us because they show whether our ideas really work in everyday life. 

    But I also learn a lot about how companies involve their employees, what media they consume, and which influencers they follow. This helps us understand who they trust today—and how we can best reach them in their reality. 

    Ultimately, tradespeople don’t want new tools for the sake of tools, but peace of mind—and construction software that noticeably saves them time. 

    Your team has grown massively in a short period of time. How did Plancraft scale its team from 40 to over 100 employees within a year? What specific mechanisms do you use to preserve your corporate culture? 

    Culture doesn’t just happen on its own – it has to be actively lived and consciously nurtured. That was one of the biggest insights we gained during the last growth phase. Even though culture often sounds vague, we make it explicit: through clear values, fixed rituals, and constant reference to our strategy and goals. 

    The most important thing remains: leading by example. Culture stands and falls with the behavior of the leadership team – but it only comes alive when each person takes responsibility for it. 

    We constantly invest in culture – with team events, workations, and workshops that create space for connection and exchange. Because the bigger we get, the more important it is to consciously maintain closeness, trust, and our vshared energy. 

    What role do you want Plancraft to play in achieving climate goals? Where do you see the trade and construction industry in three years? 

    Our customers are the biggest lever for climate change. They build, renovate, modernize – and thus make direct decisions about energy efficiency and resource use. 

    When our craftsmen’s software reduces office work, avoids empty runs, and minimizes construction errors, we create space for precisely this work. Every hour we give back to craftsmen can be put into climate-friendly construction. 

    In three years, we see Plancraft as the European standard for construction and craft businesses – and the digital foreman as an integral part of every construction site. The generational change that has already begun will lead to the closure and consolidation of craft businesses, but also to their faster digitalization. We see this as a great opportunity.  

    Julian Wiedenhaus, co-founder of plancraft. An app/software and AI agent for craftsmen. Photographed in the plancraft offices in Hamburg, Germany. ( Photo: Maria Feck)

    About Julian Wiedenhaus and Plancraft 

    Julian Wiedenhaus is CEO and co-founder of Plancraft, an AI-first craftsman software company based in Hamburg. Founded in 2020, the company completed a Series B financing round of €38 million in 2025, led by Headline, HTGF, and Creandum. Plancraft employs around 120 people and serves approximately 20,000 skilled trades businesses in Europe. 

    Plancraft positions itself as the “European Contractor Operating System” – an AI-first SaaS platform for tradespeople. The software digitizes key processes such as quote calculation, digital time tracking, construction site documentation, and team communication. With its “digital foreman,” Plancraft relies on an AI co-worker that automates office work and gives tradespeople more time for their core work. The company is active in Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, and Poland with its own employees and continues to expand in Europe. 

  • Interview with casavi CEO Peter Schindlmeier

    Interview with casavi CEO Peter Schindlmeier

    Using AI for smart property management: Interview with casavi CEO Peter Schindlmeier on the acquisition of MANAGBL.AI  

    With the acquisition of MANAGBL.AI, casavi is taking an important strategic step toward even smarter and more efficient property management. In this interview, Peter Schindlmeier, CEO and co-founder of casavi, explains how a successful partnership turned into an acquisition—and how artificial intelligence is set to bring about lasting change to processes in the industry in the future. 

    He talks about the background to the integration of MANAGBL.AI into the casavi platform, the benefits for customers, and the vision of fully automated property management in Europe. 

    Peter Schindlmeier, CEO and co-founder of casavi (Photo: casavi)

    The key takeaways from our conversation: 

    • Strategic acquisition: A successful partnership between casavi and MANAGBL.AI led to the logical next step – an acquisition to combine AI expertise and platform strength. 
    • Technological integration: MANAGBL.AI’s AI will be gradually integrated into the casavi platform and will automate communication and service processes across multiple channels in the future. 
    • Added value for customers: Administrations benefit from direct AI access via casavi, including an integrated Lite version that provides immediate relief in day-to-day business. 
    • Vision for the future: casavi sees artificial intelligence as the key to fully automated, round-the-clock property management – and aims to become the leading platform for digital property management in Europe. 

    How did the acquisition of MANAGBL.AI come about? How has the collaboration developed? 

    The partnership with MANAGBL.AI began in 2023. From the outset, we were convinced that we were pursuing the same mission: to relieve the burden on property management companies through digital solutions. Together, we were quickly able to support over 150 customers with AI-supported call answering and automated process creation. 

    In everyday use, it became clear how well the technologies complement each other and how positive the customer feedback is. This led to close cooperation, which has now resulted in a takeover as the next step. 

    For us, this was the logical next step: we are combining the AI expertise and speed of MANAGBL.AI with our platform and market experience to offer our customers even more added value in the future. 

    What were the decisive reasons for you to acquire MANAGBL.AI? 

    MANAGBL.AI demonstrated early on that its AI solution provides real relief in the day-to-day work of property management companies. In addition, our joint customer group clearly confirmed the benefits in large numbers. For us, it was the ideal complement: scalable technology, high market fit, and a team that shares our vision. 

    How are you integrating MANAGBL.AI’s technology into the casavi platform?   

    MANAGBL.AI’s AI technology will be integrated into the casavi platform step by step. This will make it even easier for customers to automatically capture calls, WhatsApp messages, or emails and transfer them directly to casavi processes. The goal is to gradually be able to make case-closing suggestions, regardless of the communication channel. 

    At the same time, MANAGBL.AI will remain available as a standalone solution, so that existing integrations and product development for non-casavi customers will continue seamlessly. 

     What are your next steps? 

    For our customers, the acquisition means one thing above all: MANAGBL.AI’s AI will be available directly through casavi. Contracts and service will continue to run as usual through casavi, making access particularly easy. 

    Existing customers will also receive an embedded Lite version in casavi so they can immediately use initial AI functions in customer service with minimal setup effort. In the next steps, we will actually connect additional channels. These include WhatsApp and web chats. At the same time, we are also focusing even more strongly on the automatic triggering of workflows, ideally leading to the fully automated resolution of tenant issues. 

    What role does artificial intelligence currently play in real estate management—and what potential do you see in the coming years? 

    Today, AI primarily helps to record and correctly classify inquiries more quickly. This already saves a lot of time in day-to-day business and improves service. In the coming years, we see the greatest potential in processing cases from start to finish – from the receipt of an inquiry to an automated solution. This not only makes service significantly more efficient, but also available around the clock. For property managers, this creates a whole new level of service that consistently exceeds the expectations of owners and tenants. 

    What is your vision for the future of digital property management in Europe? 

    We are convinced that buildings will be much more automated in the future than they are today. From digital tenant support to predictive maintenance, artificial intelligence plays a central role in this. However, this requires a comprehensive database and digital accessibility for the various stakeholders in order to truly automate end-to-end processes. We therefore believe that casavi is in an excellent position to become the central platform for this modern form of real estate management. 

    Thank you so much for taking the time to talk to us! 

  • Interview with Dr. Ingo Ramesohl

    Interview with Dr. Ingo Ramesohl

    “Clear interplay of technology, market demand, and climate benefits” – Interview with Dr. Ingo Ramesohl, Managing Director of Bosch Ventures 

    Rabot Energy develops solutions for dynamic electricity tariffs and intelligent control of flexible consumers. This is an important lever for better aligning demand with the fluctuating supply of renewable energies. 

    Bosch Ventures, the corporate venture capital arm of our fund investor Bosch, recently acquired a stake in Rabot Energy. This move strengthens a leading industry player’s commitment to a market that ensures grid stability, lower costs for consumers, and real climate benefits. 

    On the occasion of the investment, we spoke with Dr. Ingo Ramesohl, Managing Director of Bosch Ventures, about the reasons for the investment, the collaboration with Rabot Energy, and the role of technology and data in the energy transition. 

    Dr. Ingo Ramesohl, Managing Director of Bosch Ventures (Photo: Bosch Ventures)

    How did Bosch Ventures become aware of Rabot Energy? 

    We became aware of Rabot Energy because their approach is exactly what we are interested in: dynamic electricity tariffs combined with intelligent control of flexible consumers. It’s a strong concept with great potential for the future. Through regular exchanges with HTGF – we represent Bosch on the HTGF Digital Tech Investment Committee, for example – we were in contact with them at a very early stage. 

    How did the collaboration with Rabot Energy develop? 

    Excellently! From the outset, we were impressed by Rabot’s holistic approach – from price pass-through to control via app. In addition to the financial investment by Bosch Ventures, the collaboration between Bosch and Rabot is already yielding visible results: Bosch’s home appliances division, for example, has released a feature that automatically starts appliances at the most cost-effective time. For our Siemens Home Appliances brand, this was communicated as smartStart at the IFA – including a reference to Rabot Energy. 

    What was the deciding factor in the investment decision? 

    The decisive factor was the clear interplay of technology, market demand, and climate benefits – and the strong team behind Rabot. 

    What potential do flexible electricity tariffs offer for electronics, automotive, and household appliances? 

    Studies show that by 2035, around 10% of German electricity consumption could be balanced through flexible control. Flexible tariffs help to better match electricity demand with supply, especially when there is a lot of volatile generation from wind or solar in the grid. This creates stability, savings potential, and lower costs for consumers. In the automotive industry, flexible tariffs make it possible to control the charging times of electric cars so that they draw electricity when it is particularly cheap and climate friendly. Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) offers further possibilities here. When it comes to household appliances, users can use their devices intelligently so that they run when electricity prices are low or when there is sufficient renewable electricity available – as Bosch demonstrated at IFA with smartStart. 

    How do you see the role of technology and data in the energy market? 

    They are a central component of the energy transition – through intelligent control, precise forecasts, and more efficient consumption. 

    Thank you very much for your time and your insights! 

  • findIQ: Knowledge management reimagined – in conversation with Sina 

    findIQ: Knowledge management reimagined – in conversation with Sina 

    findIQ: Knowledge management reimagined – in conversation with Sina 

    Industrial plants are becoming increasingly complex, while experienced specialists are becoming scarce. In the worst-case scenario, this knowledge gap can bring entire production lines to a standstill. This is where findIQ comes in. The startup’s mission is to make technical experts’ valuable knowledge available digitally, anytime, anywhere in the world and for any plant. We spoke to Sina, the co-founder and CEO of findIQ, about the company’s origins, her learning journey, and her plans for international expansion. 

    Sina Volkmann, the co-founder and CEO of findIQ (Photo: findIQ)

    What was the motivation to found findIQ? 

    Sina: We are solving a real problem: the shortage of skilled workers in the technical sector. When we started, the problem was slightly different. During the pandemic, many technical experts in Germany were unable to travel, resulting in around 70% more downtime costs worldwide. This demonstrated the significant impact of experienced employees being unable to be on site to identify faults and resolve issues with machinery. 

    It was this realisation that motivated us to found the company. Initially, we wanted to tackle the problem head-on during the pandemic crisis, and we systematically investigated what a sustainable solution might look like. Our approach was pragmatic from the outset: understand the problem, find the right solution, and think long term. 

    Has the situation changed since? 

    Sina: Today, we are still facing the same challenge: there are too few technical specialists for increasingly complex systems. Added to this are trends such as demographic change, a shortage of skilled workers, and an increasing turnover of staff in technical professions. Our solution digitises the specialist knowledge of individual experts and makes it available at any time and in any location. This means that future generations will also be able to keep machines running, even if the necessary expertise is not available on site. 

    You have rethought knowledge management in machine servicing. What makes your solution different? 

    Sina: findIQ is an AI-based knowledge management platform for technical systems, but our approach is fundamentally different. A key point is our definition of knowledge. For us, it’s not just a collection of data and documents; it’s also experience — what is often stored in the minds of experienced technicians and not simply found in manuals. 

    Many AI models, such as large language models, are purely data-driven. While they can access huge amounts of explicit information, they often lack the deep, implicit knowledge that has been built up in practice over decades. This ‘head knowledge’ is crucial for putting data and documents into the right context, particularly with regard to complex machines in daily operation. From the outset, we have developed methods to digitise and secure precisely this knowledge. This is our first and most important USP. 

    A second important difference lies in how knowledge is managed. Many classic systems are simply filing systems. They store information once it has been entered, but then they become rigid and quickly outdated. This is insufficient in modern industry, where machines and production processes are constantly evolving. Our approach is dynamic: we view knowledge as an ongoing cycle that is continuously updated. Rather than working with language models, we map the logical thought patterns of experts. 

    How can you achieve this? 

    Sina: We integrate feedback directly into our system from machine operators, technicians, and service teams. This ensures that the data remains up to date and relevant for everyday use. Our independence from machine data gives us enormous flexibility. We can work globally and across industries without the need for complex integrations or specialised hardware adaptations. 

    The end result is a system that stores and keeps alive existing knowledge – a real competitive advantage in an industry where experience and efficiency determine success or stagnation. 

    What were your most important learnings in the initial phase? 

    Sina: One of the most important things I learnt was that our instincts are often the best compass, despite all the advice from outside sources. You start with a clear motivation and should always refer to it, especially when many stakeholders become involved. 

    Our customers have always been the most important source of feedback. We focused on doing more of what works and letting go of what doesn’t, even if that meant doing things in an unconventional way. 

    Another lesson we learned is that success doesn’t mean doing every step perfectly, but making continuous progress. Sometimes taking the next step in the right direction is enough instead of achieving perfection immediately. 

    Following your latest round of financing, what are the next steps on the agenda? 

    Sina: Internationalisation is a logical next step for us. Our customers, especially German machine manufacturers, export their products worldwide. Accordingly, we also have to think globally. 

    Our next target market is the USA, where the shortage of skilled workers is referred to as a ‘skills shortage’ or ‘labour shortage’. The demographic trend there is similar to that in Germany, only on a larger scale. Through our latest funding round, we aim to systematically access this market with the support of local partners and our own on-site staff. 

    We deliberately chose the USA because there is demand there and the cultural differences are manageable. It was also important to us to build on existing customer relationships and establish a foundation through early sales. 

    What advice would you give to founders who are just starting out? 

    Sina: Sina: Be aware that setting up a company is an all-consuming task! You need to learn to deal with resistance and accept that things won’t always run smoothly. Customer feedback is invaluable because it shows what actually works. Every step in the right direction counts. Not everything has to be perfect. 

    Thank you very much for your time and insights! 

  • Thinking digitally about school: How paddy wants to take the pressure off teachers

    Thinking digitally about school: How paddy wants to take the pressure off teachers

    Thinking digitally about school: How paddy wants to take the pressure off teachers

    The founders of paddy know the challenges of everyday school life from their own experience. From the perspective of former students and with deep insight into the pressures faced by teachers, Matty Frommann, Lukas Portmann and Tobias Schröder have developed an AI platform that saves teachers time and enables more individualised support. We talked to Matty and Felix Assion, Investment Manager at HTGF, about the beginnings of paddy, the market potential of EdTech and a vision for the school of the future.

    Matty Frommann, CEO and co-founder of paddy, and Felix Assion, Investment Manager at HTGF

    Matty, how did you come up with the idea for paddy? Were there specific moments during your school days that made you realise, “Something is wrong here, we need to change this”?

    Matty Frommann: We actually started giving training courses for teachers when we were still at school. Most of us come from families of teachers. My co-founders’ parents are teachers, and so are some of my relatives. This meant that we were always aware of the challenges posed by digital media, but also issues such as workload and teacher shortages, especially during the coronavirus pandemic.

    Many teachers now downright hate the topic of digitalisation because they say it’s an add-on that doesn’t help them. The existing software doesn’t solve the actual problem – and that was basically the founding idea behind paddy.

    The pandemic was an accelerator. That’s exactly where we came in.

    How did you meet? What was your first impression, Felix, when you met Matty, Lukas and Tobias?

    Felix Assion: Matty had been in contact with HTGF for some time.  My first conversation with Matty was at the beginning of March, and shortly afterwards we had our first joint pitch round. My first impression was that Matty is extremely professional, already has a great deal of domain expertise in the EdTech sector and showed healthy self-confidence throughout the whole process. A little later, I visited the team in Bielefeld and noticed the energy the guys had and how much structure they had already built up, especially in areas such as sales and go-to-market. For me, this visit was a game-changer and I knew that I definitely wanted to make this deal happen. After that, our collaboration picked up speed.


    Matty, was it challenging to build trust, especially as young founders? Were there any reactions from teachers along the lines of, “What do they want to teach us?”

    Matty Frommann: At first, we had a healthy naivety that drove us forward. That was great for getting started, and even afterwards, we actually benefited from being so young. People always believed that we had experienced the pain points ourselves as students, that we weren’t far removed from the situation, and that we could increasingly connect the two target groups – teachers and students. That was more of a door opener.


    How do you see the market potential for paddy, Felix?

    Felix Assion: That’s not an easy topic. EdTech or education, especially when it has a B2G component, is a difficult field – particularly from a VC perspective. The big hype of the Corona years is over. Statistically, there has been a sharp decline in investments or investment volume in this area year over year since 2022. But if you look at the education market, it is similar in size to insurance, health or even mobility. Historically, the market has also been quite capital-efficient. The ratio between valuation and the capital required is very positive in the education sector. I believe that paddy has extremely good timing. Teachers have gained initial experience with AI tools and are realising that the perfect dedicated solution for them does not yet exist. At the same time, pressure on this professional group is increasing enormously, as recent studies – such as those by the German Bitkom[1] – show. Matty knows more about this, but it is only since the coronavirus pandemic that we have had a situation where the hardware equipment is virtually ideal for such business cases. This means that everything is actually coming together perfectly. Personally, I am therefore very bullish about the next few years with paddy.

    Matty Frommann: Historically, two types of EdTech cases have always worked well: either you go into a very niche market – for example, with a training platform for dentists – or you cover a wide range, such as with a cloud system for schools that everyone can benefit from.

    I believe that with paddy and AI in general, we now can combine both and tap into a huge market. Every teacher supports each student individually as best they can, while at the same time reaching the masses.

    What is your vision for schools in 10 years – and what role will paddy play in it?

    Matty Frommann: Digitalisation and digital tools that support teaching will be the absolute standard. We are finally managing to connect all areas – lesson preparation, implementation and follow-up, backed up by data – and offer every student an individual learning experience. That is exactly where paddy wants to position itself.

    I also believe that in 10 years’ time, we will be in a situation where technology will provide good answers to the foreseeable shortage of teachers and enable us to offer every student an individual learning experience.

    Matty Frommann (right) with his co-founders.


    What advice would you give to young founders? Are there any particular hurdles in the EdTech sector?

    Felix Assion: In EdTech, perhaps more than anywhere else, having a great product just isn’t enough.

    From an early stage, including in fundraising, you realise that the focus is shifting towards distribution, sales and go-to-market, and that you are expected to have experience and a clear strategy from the outset. This is why I advise teams to spend more time on this than they would in other industries, where an MVP and a pitch deck are often sufficient.

    Saying that Paddy “raised €1 million in six months” is only half the story – there’s usually a long phase beforehand where the business model and dynamics have to be developed, and where schools and teachers have to be understood.

    Once you’ve reached that point as a team and are ready for financing, you should take the time to research which investors are a good fit. What added value can help us beyond capital? There aren’t many investors who can offer this, but I think the team solved this issue very well in the end.

    All of that was part of the journey. So my main piece of advice would be: take your time, build structures – and that doesn’t just apply to the product itself.

    Matty Frommann: My advice: focus everything on sales, start as many test pilots as possible and – very important in the EdTech sector – acquire paying customers. That should be the core objective. Marketing becomes exciting when you scale up to a critical mass of customers and establish various channels. But the most important thing is the first 50 customers. We also started with our first 50 paddy customers – and that didn’t happen in two months. It took years to find the right contacts, be represented on the relevant committees, attend the right networking events and understand the market.

    Thank you very much for your time and insights!


    [1] “50% of teachers have used AI for School” Bitkom Research (German) – Bereits jede zweite Lehrkraft hat KI für die Schule genutzt | Bitkom Research

  • Interview with Proxima Fusion’s Francesco Sciortino 

    Interview with Proxima Fusion’s Francesco Sciortino 

    Making commercial fusion a reality: An Interview with Proxima Fusion’s Francesco Sciortino 

    HTGF portfolio company Proxima Fusion recently raised €130 million in Series A funding to bring commercial fusion energy closer to reality.

    We sat down with CEO and Co-founder Francesco Sciortino to discuss what this milestone means for the team, the promise of their Stellaris reactor, their journey from research to startup, the potential impact of their “Alpha” demonstration system, and his advice for other deep-tech founders facing major challenges. 

    Congratulations on your successful funding round! What does this milestone mean for you as a team, and how will it affect your future goals? 

    This means that we have the validation of both our approach and the team we have built. Working with the Max Planck Society in Germany and our simulation-driven engineering approach have proven successful. 

    We have moved faster than we thought was possible, delivering the Stellaris design and magnet technology in the lab. We have now secured financing to go full steam ahead with our hardware milestones. We are now the largest stellarator-based fusion company on the planet. We have raised as much money as all our stellarator competitors combined. We now have no excuse but to deliver. 

    Can you walk us through the technological foundation behind your approach with Stellaris? 

    So, the general category of devices that we work on is magnetic confinement fusion. This includes both tokamaks and stellarators, but also other subcategories. I have a background in tokamak physics. Tokamaks are the most conventional of the magnetic confinement fusion approaches. They are magnet systems that look like doughnuts, where you try to confine hot, ionized matter in helically twisting magnetic fields. 

    Stellarators are very similar. In fact, you could say that a tokamak is a special type of stellarator. However, for the longest time, stellarators were blocked on the physics side. But in 2022, the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator at the Max Planck Society in Germany met its major design targets, and we now know that stellarators can be built and that we can design new stellarators to be power plants rather than just science experiments. Proxima Fusion spun out of the Max Planck in early 2023, to bring stellarators to commercialization. As stellarators have been getting more and more attention, there are now eight stellarator companies worldwide. 

    How is Proxima Fusion’s approach different from others in the fusion space, and what are you ultimately aiming to achieve? 

    All of these stellarator startups are still relatively small compared to the largest tokamak company in the world: Commonwealth Fusion Systems, or CFS for short. CFS has raised more than $2 billion, and they are very good at what they are doing. They are trying to build a tokamak that makes energy with the same kind of superconducting magnet technology that Proxima is working on. We agree on lots of things between tokamaks and stellarators. The physics basis is the same, but the biggest difference is that well-designed stellarators can work in continuous operation, and they can be completely stable.

    That is the moon shot within the moon shot we are making with Proxima. Our goal is not to design something that creates energy for a short time, just a fancy flash of light powered by fusion. Instead, we are actually trying to build a power plant.

    There are around 60 fusion companies right now, companies that actually aim to make reactors, and out of these, approx. 10 fusion startups have raised €100 million or more. We are now in a race to build the net energy device on our path to the first fusion power plant in the world. Let’s see who succeeds!  

    Francesco Sciortino, CEO and Co-founder of Proxima Fusion (Photo: Proxima Fusion)

    What was the journey from research to independent startup like? What were the most important insights that you and your team gained along the way? 

    We started out as physicists researching tokamaks and stellarators. Our co-founder Martin Kubie has a background in mechanical engineering and has worked at Google X. Spinning out from the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, we had to adapt and create a new way of working with a more engineering-centric perspective and a greater focus on simulation in order to enable faster iteration. Iteration speed is everything. You cannot iterate on building a whole stellarator, it is too big, so you cannot iterate on full scale hardware integration, but you can integrate on the large system in software. To do so, you have to work on a fusion concept that is experimentally validated. Otherwise, if you do not trust your models, then you can iterate as fast as you want, but they are going to be continuously wrong. For us, the enabler was to recognize that stellarators now have a much more mature physics basis than just a few years ago.  

    As a spin-off from Max Planck Society, we have always been big believers in public-private partnerships and the importance of working together. It is not necessarily simple. We are two very different organizations, but the important thing has always been the mission-driven mindset and finding the common ground to get this thing to lift off at all. And I think something we Europeans still need to hone is the ability to increasingly translate theoretical research into operations into practical engineering. 

    We learned that hiring is very hard, but also the most important thing: Finding the right people is everything. The quality of the founding team is a big indicator of what is to come. But the only thing that really matters is whether you know how to hire people better than yourself, and that we have arguably done well. Perhaps that is the one thing that was not quite clear in the very early days, but somehow, we have picked up speed very quickly. 

    Your demonstration system “Alpha” is planned to start operations in 2031 and then produce more energy than it consumes. Why is it such a critical step toward commercial fusion energy? 

    The demonstration system that we call Alpha is an energy-producing device. The process of the stars down on Earth. It is a demonstration and not a power plant yet, but Alpha is designed to be the last thing we will ever need to build before we construct a power plant. 

    We believe it is the right kind of device for a fusion power plant, which is operating continuously and is fully stable. That is the sweet sauce of Proxima: If we get Alpha done, Proxima might be one of the most valuable companies on the planet. But that is proportional to the value of the market and it is generally related to the need for clean, safe and abundant energy. The reason why we have been chasing fusion for a good part of 70 years is that there is fundamentally nothing else quite like it. We are talking about burning heavy forms of hydrogen on a nuclear level, so joining light nuclei, heavy forms of hydrogen, not like uranium, plutonium and so on. They are at opposite ends of the periodic table. We are at the simplest part of the periodic table. Most of the universe is made up of hydrogen. The fuel is nearly infinite.  

    Team of Proxima Fusion (Photo: Proxima Fusion)

    How could fusion energy — and Alpha in particular — impact the planet, society, and the way we think about energy? 

    One bottle of this heavy hydrogen fuel could power Munich for a week. Just one spoonful of this fuel is equivalent to 13 tons of coal. This is certain, this is not a theory. We can do this at a small scale in the lab. We know that the sun is burning in this way. This is simply how the universe is powered. The question is: can we make it cheap enough? And can we build these power plants fast enough? That is what will determine the future. It is not a physics proof of principle. What we need is an engineering and commercial proof of principle.  

    Germany is facing an energy crisis, and Europe is facing a technology sovereignty crisis. There has never really been a better time to think about this massive scaling of fusion systems similar to the way France scaled their energy system around fission in the 1970s. If we want fusion to account for 20–30% of the world’s energy production, and we need to act quickly to have an impact on the climate over the next few decades, then we need to consider how to build 1,000 power plants fast. That means we need to think of a system that can scale. 

    What advice would you give to other deep-tech founders tackling major technological challenges? 

    No egos allowed, you need a mission-first mindset. You need to be fully aware of why you are dedicating so much of your life to something. We could all be doing things that pay better or allow more free time. We are here out of choice and the mission is worth a significant chunk of your life, so this must be clear to the founders. 

    Thanks so much for the interesting insights!  

  • Deep-Tech Matrix

    Deep-Tech Matrix

    HTGF Deep-Tech Matrix: Navigating the Growth Path of Technology-Driven Startups

    Deep-tech companies develop technologies that can transform entire industries. That makes them exciting – especially for investors. Yet many startups struggle to clearly explain their potential.

    Often, what’s missing is a consistent and compelling story. HTGF experts Dr. Gernot Berger, Dr. Olaf Joeressen, and Yann Fiebig have tackled this challenge. In a recent paper, they outline what really matters for deep-tech startups – and present a practical tool to help: the HTGF Deep-Tech Matrix. 

    Deep tech stands for innovation rooted in science and engineering. Whether it’s AI, robotics, new materials, or biotech – deep-tech startups aren’t solving small, everyday problems. They tackle major societal and industrial challenges. The current momentum in deep tech is more than a trend. For many, it represents hope – hope that we can keep innovating at a high level. And for investors, it’s an opportunity to support radical change with the potential for significant returns. 

    The Deep-Tech Disconnect: why great tech alone is not enough to convince investors 

    Despite their promise, many deep-tech founders face a tough reality: investors hesitate. It’s not about quality or potential – it’s about a mismatch in expectations. This gap is called the deep-tech disconnect. It refers to the structural difference between how tech-heavy companies evolve and how most VC investors think. 

    Investment models of the past two decades have been shaped by software startups: fast Minimal Viable Products (MVPs), early user feedback, and low capital requirements. Deep tech doesn’t follow that path. These companies need years to develop, require substantial funding, and only reach market readiness much later. 

    That’s why deep-tech startups need a different kind of pitch – a well-crafted equity story. It has to go beyond standard slides and metrics. It must clearly define a big, unsolved customer problem. It must show why a scientific or technological breakthrough is the right – or only – way to solve it. And it must explain why this specific team is the one that can turn the idea into a product. A convincing story makes the technology tangible: with patents, deep expertise, and a realistic roadmap that connects lab to market. 

    The HTGF Deep-Tech Matrix: Navigating a Complex Journey 

    So how do you describe a startup’s progress if it’s not measured in revenue or MVPs? That’s where the HTGF Deep-Tech Matrix comes in. It’s a hands-on tool to plan, explain, and communicate the path from scientific idea to scalable business. It helps founders build a clear equity story – and creates a shared language between them and investors. 

    The matrix is based on two key dimensions: technology readiness and certainty for a huge market. Tech readiness is assessed using standard TRL scales – from early research (TRL 1–2) to proof-of-concept (3–4) to market-ready solutions (8–9). Successful founders know where they are, what comes next, and what they can already show. 

    The second dimension – the market – is often underestimated. But for fundraising, it’s crucial. Is the market proven? Is there strong growth potential? Is the problem clearly defined and validated by real customer demand? The matrix helps assess these questions, too. 

    Each cell in the matrix represents a unique combination of technology and market maturity. Ideally, a startup moves step by step to the top right corner – a scalable product in a large, validated market. Along the way, typical phases can be identified: from early concepts with no clear market (“No Money Land”) to Pre-Seed, Seed, Series A and B – where scalability and repeatable revenue come into focus. 

    Putting the Matrix to Work 

    An example from the field of engineering simulation illustrates how the matrix can be applied in practice. The company developed an early cloud-based prototype aimed at a previously underserved target group: engineers without access to traditional, high-cost CAD tools. While the technological feasibility was promising, the market potential had not yet been validated. The company’s development began at a medium technology readiness level and in a market environment that was still largely unexplored. 

    What proved decisive was a clearly defined go-to-market strategy, combined with systematic product management and increasing customer engagement. This allowed the company to make continuous progress toward scalability. A coherent and well-structured equity story – one that connected the customer problem, the unique technological approach, and the commercial roadmap – played a central role in gaining investor confidence and securing funding for further growth. 

    Conclusion: Building a Shared Understanding from Day One 

    The HTGF Deep-Tech Matrix is more than just an analysis tool – it’s a compass. It helps founders structure their story, define key milestones, and communicate their journey. It also creates mutual understanding between startups and investors – with shared expectations, clear language, and realistic planning. 

    For investors, the matrix provides clarity: what tech maturity and market development are realistic at each funding stage? It turns uncertainty into informed decisions. In short: the Deep-Tech Matrix brings structure to complex ventures – and lays the foundation for successful fundraising and sustainable growth. Because even the next deep-tech unicorn starts with a well-told story. 

    Discover the Framework Behind Successful Deep Tech Growth

    Whether you’re a founder, investor, or ecosystem stakeholder, the HTGF Deep-Tech-Matrix offers a clear, strategic model for planning and evaluating deep tech equity stories. Learn how to align technological maturity with market potential, identify critical value inflection points, and foster a shared understanding between startups and investors.