How do Industrial Tech founders recognize Product-Market Fit?

Story

Part 2: The analytical and quantitative perspective

By Ingo Fehr and Gregor Haidl (both Investment Managers)

Supported by Yann Fiebig (Senior Investment Manager), Fabian Hogrebe (Analyst), Dr. Andreas Olmes (Principal)

“Are there any objective criteria or KPIs that can indicate that my start-up is on a good way to reach Product-Market Fit?” After dealing with the emotional perspective of founders when Product-Market Fit has been reached, this second blog post is dedicated to the quantitative-analytical perspective on Product-Market Fit. We hope the indicators presented in this article help you to assess and improve your own Product-Market Fit.

We were inspired by a great article of Christoph Janz’s about criteria and indicators he found useful for software as a service companies (SaaS) . To our knowledge a similar set of criteria tailored for Industrial Tech Start-ups has not been published before.

Product-Market Fit: Criteria matching with the common B2B sales process for industrial tech start-ups

The most interesting finding we had during our discussions about these criteria was, that there are good indicators in all maturity levels. They work for Industrial Tech companies although tough and long B2B sales cycles exist.

In the following figure we summarized the indicators we found to be useful depending on the actual maturity of a product or company:

You can think of it as a sales funnel: Many ideas enter from the left, are iterated along the customer discovery process and most of them die. If you’re lucky there will be at least one idea/product making it to the right side and achieving Product-Market Fit.

It’s important to understand that albeit the B2B sales process is a linear, most companies need to re-calibrate their product-market fit and even undertake pivots or restarts in later phases.

That’s why you shouldn’t stop using the early indicators as customer insights evolve over time.

Product-Market Fit Criteria for Industrial Tech: The Deep Dive

Let’s dig a bit deeper into why Industrial Tech with B2B sales is special. In many cases you must take several steps with a customer before reaching productive use of your product (and high revenues with this customer). We found these 4 steps to be adequate for most of our portfolio companies:

  1. Ideation Phase
    You show and demonstrate your idea to a customer. His main question is “could this be a potential solution for me at all?”
  2. Proof-of-Concept (PoC) to Pilot Phase
    1. You demonstrate the functionality of your product/MVP in a limited (lab) experiment in a controlled environment. Your client is answering the question “Does this work?”
    2. Your client is testing your product to a limited extend (only one team, only one site, a small subset of employees, …). His question is “How well is this working under real conditions in my company?“
  3. Productive Usage
    Your client uses your product on a larger scale. We like the term roll-out for the beginning of this phase. Unless another product pops up that solves his problem much better, he will most probable stay a loyal customer for a long time.

Ideation Phase: Customer Problem and Value Proposition

KPI Weak Product-Market Fit Strong Product-Market Fit
Problem priority Fuzzy and high-level description of industry challenges. “Let’s be innovative and try something new.”

In reference calls customers mention low price or great collaboration with team: Fast reactions or 24/7 service are reasons for choosing the product.   Customer only has high-level understanding of his problem and is often not able to describe the impact of the solution on his P&L.”
Customer is able to precisely describe his specific problem on a root cause level and is aware of the impact on his companies’ P&L.   There is urgency to solve the customer’s problem and he often tried other competitive solutions already without satisfying result.

In reference calls, customers are able to clearly describe why the start-up’s product effectively solves their problem: Fit of features and usability to customer problem is much better than any other solution.
Budget allocation Innovation budget Business unit budget
Business case of customer There is no clear, well-reasoned, detailed cost calculation of the customer’s business case. When considering all new pains (e.g. training of employees) only incremental benefit of the start-up product remain. Clear, detailed, well-reasoned or even validated business case calculation exists. Benefit of the product is at least 3x higher than the associated costs including any new pains. Customers agree to the calculation method and assumptions.
Price sensitivity High price sensitivity. Most extreme case: customer wants to try product, only if it is free of charge. Low price sensitivity due to the high value of the solution for the customer. founders experience real bargaining power. Customers are willing to accept almost all conditions due to fear of losing the future PoC/Pilot to a competitor.

Even if you just started your company, on day zero, you can focus on certain indicators to find out, if you are on the right way. You don’t need a MVP or even a product in order to find out how pressing and burning your potential customer sees the problem that you aim to solve. Again, these indicators stay valid in later phases as they are foundation of Product-Market Fit. Compared to the customer success category, these indicators are more qualitative. Therefore, mainly customer interviews & qualitative surveys can be used.

Proof of Concept to Pilot Phase: Customer Success

KPI Weak Product-Market Fit Strong Product-Market Fit
“Sean Ellis” Score None/Few of your customers would be very disappointed, if they could no longer use the product -> nice-to-have >40% of your customers would be very disappointed, if they could no longer use the product
NPS NPS of 0-10 or lower. Product is not actively recommended by the current customers to potential customers. NPS of 10-20 or higher. Users recommend the product through word-of-mouth to others.
Usage Most customers don’t use the product as frequently as you’d expect it. Most customers use the product as frequently as you’d expect them to use it (or even more) based on the use case.
Customer commitment to roll-out It stays unclear how and when a larger rollout will take place. Customers don’t stick to initial plans and timelines. Customers agree early on the criteria (target KPIs) that need to be fulfilled and commit to a clear roadmap to rollout. Timelines and plans are met by your customers.

We found the customer success criteria to be the best indicators for large roll-outs in later stages. Even in pilots or PoCs you can find out, if the users engage with your product and most importantly if they are not willing to give it away again. To measure these criteria, you must communicate with your customers. Interview them, do surveys with them and obtain usage data! Ask “Why?” several times to find out root causes and understand why product is so effective. These criteria help you in later phases to detect problems in your sales performance, killer-features and room for improvement.

Productive Usage: Pilot Conversion Pipeline

KPI Weak Product-Market Fit Strong Product-Market Fit
Roll-outs Decisions take forever. Only pilot groups are testing the product. Sales Cycles are much longer than expected. Widespread productive use of the product. Pull from other people outside of the pilot groups. Sales cycles are not a problem.
Revenue per customer Customers are paying insignificant amounts relative to their size. You can hardly cover your high B2B sales costs. Customers are paying a significant amount of money relative to the size of their company or department.
Churn Important target customers churn. For properly onboarded customers, the churn rate is close to zero. You get “Thank you, you made my life so much better!” postcards (really!)
Inbound Leads All customers come from outbound. They are mostly buddies. You lose most customers along the sales process. You’re getting an increasing amount of high-quality inbound leads. Word of mouth is spreading.

A lot of sales KPIs do not leave any room for interpretation and are directly linked to the value of your company, e.g. the revenue. We like to have a close look on these criteria, when the start-up is mature enough and has already products in productive use. From Series A onwards investors will look even closer.

Conclusion

After presenting all these indicators, the bad news is: There is no single indicator or mathematical formula that predicts product-market fit with certainty. However, these indicators were derived from our VC-experience and help us to evaluate a start-up from different angles at different points in time. The provided insights are very valuable for our investment decisions. On top of that, the presented framework provides guidance in the strategic discussions that we have every day with our portfolio companies.

We would love to hear your thoughts about these indicators! Do you use other criteria that are not displayed here? Which ones do you think matter most? Please comment!

In the next part of this blog we will present the customer development process that we found to be very helpful in our work with portfolio companies on the way to Product-Market Fit. Stay tuned!

Do you want to

mehr erfahren?

I am your contact

for all press inquiries:
Tobias Jacob

More Stories

Last update 1 days ago
Zum Artikel

Story

27. May 2025

Looking back on HTGF Family Day 2025: An anniversary of innovation and cooperation

Zum Artikel

Story

27. May 2025

Driving growth from within – How established companies can benefit from start-ups

Zum Artikel

Story

25. April 2025

Take it easy and show respect to others: how start-ups can benefit from radical friendliness – a conversation with Nora Blum

Zum Artikel

Story

31. March 2025

AI vs. Paperwork – Interview with Mike McCarthy, co-founder of cloudsquid

Zum Artikel

Story

31. March 2025

The road to animal-free drug discovery – an interview with Lukas Gaats of mo:re 

Zum Artikel

Story

27. February 2025

Innovation, Investments, Impact: A Look Back at HTGF’s Biotech Year 2024